Estimated Reading Time: 4 minutes
By Rachel Sams
You’ve just accepted a new role as a nonprofit CEO or risk leader. You quickly realize that, before you arrived, no one was formally assigned responsibility for reviewing contracts. When issues arise with vendors, you find incomplete files and partially executed agreements.
That’s just one of the stories we heard when we surveyed our audience to gauge their experiences around contracting procedures. Nonprofit leaders shared their most difficult lessons learned and recommended game-changing contracting procedures that can make a difference for your organization.
Contracting risk is a major issue for nonprofits, as we wrote in our RISK eNews two weeks ago. While our survey has a small sample size, it provides an informal opportunity to benchmark your organization against our data.
Representatives from 46 nonprofits responded to our survey. Nonprofit sizes represented ranged from less than $10 million in annual revenue to more than $100 million. 64% of respondents were from nonprofits with annual revenues under $50 Million, while 36% of respondents were from large organizations, with annual revenues in excess of $50 Million.
The majority of respondents, 66 percent, have no in-house attorney to review contracts. But a similar number, just under two-thirds of respondents, have a written policy or procedure that governs how they handle contracts. The most common element of those written policies or procedures is language clarifying who is authorized to execute contracts. Contracting policies also frequently designate contract review by a non-attorney staff member and specify the level of review based on the contract size or scope. Only 22% of organizations with a contracting procedure require that all contract signers participate in contract process training.
About 17 percent of respondents review and revisit standard contract language annually, 52 percent review it periodically, 19 percent never review it, and 12 percent review it on some other schedule.
More than 80 percent of respondents don’t use a third-party vendor for contract review and management.
We asked respondents if they would strongly recommend any of their contracting procedures to others. One nonprofit leader shared simple, emphatic advice: “Clearly define who has authority to sign, and adopt a review process by appropriate staff.” Another leader said their nonprofit has benefited from a set of templates with color coding and comments that show which contract provisions are negotiable and which aren’t.
Another organization recommends a standardized checklist for vetting vendors. (NRMC has received requests on this topic recently and is working on a resource for that, so stay tuned!) Another nonprofit leader recommended that organizations learn to explain insurance requirements to vendors and share why those requirements vary based on the scope of work. Yet another respondent offered two pieces of sage advice that we heartily endorse: “Limit who is/are authorized to sign contracts. Vet all contractors, including references, to confirm they have the ability to do the work they were contracted to do.”
We asked respondents how they plan to improve their contracting programs. Some of the plans shared by survey takers included:
Contracting risk is an exposure shared by all nonprofits. Building structure, and identifying ways to improve and document processes are well worth the time and effort involved. And the best news is that it’s never too late to make progress to close the gaps and build greater resilience against contract risk.
Rachel Sams is a Consultant and Staff Writer at the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. Her biggest lesson learned on this topic: always read the fine print. Reach out to her with your questions or insights about nonprofit contracting issues at rachel@nonprofitrisk.org or 505.456.4045.
“First let me congratulate you on a conference well done. I had a great time at the Nonprofit Employee Benefits Conference and walked away with some valuable tools and questions that we’ll need to be addressing in both the short and long term. Thanks to you and your staff for all you do to provide us with quality resources in support of our missions.”
“BBYO’s engagement of the Center to conduct a risk assessment was one of the most valuable processes undertaken over the past five years. Numerous programmatic and procedural changes were recommended and have since been implemented. Additionally, dozens (literally) of insurance coverage gaps were identified that would never have been without the work of the Center. This assessment led to a broker bidding process that resulted in BBYO’s selection of a new broker that we have been extremely satisfied with. I unconditionally recommend the Center for their consultative services.
“Melanie Herman has provided expert, insightful, timely and well resourced information to our Executive Team and Board of Directors. Our corporation recently experienced massive growth through merger and the Board has been working to better integrate their expanded set of roles and responsibilities. Melanie presented at our Annual Board of Director’s Retreat and captured the interest of our Board members. As a result of her excellent presentation the Board has engaged in focused review which is having immediate effects on governance.”
“The Nonprofit Risk Management Center has been an outstanding partner for us. They are attentive to our needs, and work hard to successfully meet our requests for information. Being an Affiliate member gave us access to so many time- and money-saving resources that it easily paid for itself! Nonprofit Risk Management Center is truly a valued partner of The Community Foundation of Elkhart County and we are continuously able to optimize staff time with the support given by their team.”
“The board and staff of the Prince George’s Child Resource Center are extremely pleased with the results of the risk assessment conducted by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. A thorough scan revealed that while we are a well run organization, we had risks that we never imagined. We are grateful to know that we have now minimized our organizational risks and we recommend the Center to other nonprofits.”
Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Human Services is committed to protecting those who improve your communities. The Center team has committed to delivering dynamic risk management solutions tailored to nonprofit organizations. These organizations have many and varied risk issues, hence the need for specialized coverage and expert knowledge for their protection. We’ve had Melanie speak on several occasions to employees and our agents. She is always on point and delivers such great value. Thank you for the terrific partnership and allowing our nonprofits to focus on their mission!