Estimated Reading Time: 9 minutes
By Melanie Lockwood Herman
Resource Type: Articles
Topic: Business Continuity Planning, Insurance and Risk Financing
The prospect of a recession—whether it’s the short-term variety we experienced in 2020, or the long-term version whose impact stretched well beyond 2008—should inspire a commitment to pause and reflect. None of us know how and when the most mission-impactful risks will materialize. But any planning we do now will serve us well when an economic crisis or disruption begins.
In his timeless book, The Prediction Trap, author Randy Park writes that “…by anticipating different possibilities for the future, you can sleep well knowing things will be taken care of no matter what happens.” The reminder to consider “different possibilities” is invaluable; as Park explains in the book, when we focus narrowly on a “single path to the future” we are likely to overlook potential off-ramps and detours, from wonderful possibilities to dangers.
There is no value in unproductive worry. To harness helpful anxiety about the future, risk leaders and nonprofit executives should turn to a tried and true planning tool for help. Scenario planning exercises can be very helpful to teams who want to position their nonprofits to survive and thrive in the future, including when that future includes a recession.
In its Guide to Scenario Planning for Functional Leaders, the firm Gartner offers a familiar four-square template with quadrants to fill with potential outcomes under four different scenarios. To use this tool, begin by identifying two significant uncertainties facing your nonprofit this year. For example:
After 1) choosing 2 significant uncertainties (from the list above, or issues that make mission sense to your team), 2) identify the extreme ends of each uncertainty. For example:
Uncertainty #1: Demand for/participation in our core services:
Uncertainty #2: Variance in the needs of our clientele/participants/constituents
Step 3 using this approach is to use the space in the chart to describe, in bullet form, the circumstances related to extreme outcomes of each uncertainty on both ends of each axis.
Following the example above you will have 4 scenarios:
For each of the above scenarios, brainstorm practical steps your organization could take to cope. Helpful question prompts for your team might include:
Below is an example of a completed four-square chart based on the above 4 scenarios.
In the McKinsey & Company article, “Overcoming Obstacles to Effective Scenario Planning,” the authors point out cognitive biases that reduce the effectiveness of scenario planning exercises. They offer practical tips for recognizing and countering 3 biases relevant to any planning exercise.
Availability Bias: This bias draws us to rely on information we already know and miss the opportunity to name and discover what we don’t. To counter this bias, ask early on: what assumptions are we making? Or: What don’t we know about this scenario that we should before finalizing plans?
Stability Bias: Described as “the trap of extrapolation” in the book The Prediction Trap, this bias leads us to believe the future will look like the past. Humans crave stability, consistency, and familiar surroundings. The truth for all nonprofits is that the future—even in a recession similar in some fashion to one you’ve lived through—will likely be very different from the past. To counter this bias, begin the exercise with a list of distinct, significant uncertainties. Build the scenarios by combining extreme outcomes of two uncertainties. Avoid the temptation to focus on a simple, mild-stretch scenario, such as “we experience a 10% drop in demand.” When you develop action steps in response to the extreme reaches of uncertainty, the actions you take will help if reality is not as extreme as you imagined.
Optimism/Overconfidence Bias: After navigating the COVID pandemic, many nonprofit leaders found new confidence about their ability to navigate and thrive in the face of a highly disruptive event. Many leaders tell us they are proud of how their missions weathered the initial shock of work-from-home orders and how staff teams quickly adapted to new ways of working. Your success managing through the pandemic could lead to overconfidence that your mission can survive any disruptive event. Counter optimism bias by taking the time to work through multiple scenarios, versus focusing on the scenario that seems most likely.
Focus on possibilities, not probabilities. In their book Warnings: Finding Cassandras to Stop Catastrophes, Richard A. Clarke and R.P. Eddy remind us that “If data is in short supply, don’t worry about probability. Probability is not likely to be a useful measure when dealing with the risk of a disaster that has never occurred before, or only happened at great intervals.” In NRMC’s experience, many risk teams get bogged down trying to sort and resort their unwieldy risk registers based on wild guesses about the likelihood or probability of never-experienced, dire future risk events. What do the most worrisome risks at a typical nonprofit have in common? They are possible future events: the organization hasn’t yet faced the circumstances and downside consequences that nightmares are made of. These seemingly improbable outcomes are the ideal focus for productive scenario planning workshops.
Face your inconvenient truths. What facts, possibilities, or turns of events would make it very difficult—or impossible—to achieve your #1 strategic priority? What circumstances—triggered by an economic recession—represent your mission’s Achilles’ Heel?
Search for sentinel intelligence. An individual with “sentinel intelligence” can see clearly through a “fog of indicators.” Rally team members who can sort the signals from the noise to join the risk team for scenario planning exercises and risk action planning. Your mission will benefit from their foresight, and this example will encourage your team members to speak out in the future.
Don’t be frugal. Rushed, poorly envisioned, or haphazard scenario planning exercises are unlikely to yield action-oriented plans that will protect your mission from disaster. Take time to recruit a diverse group of colleagues to participate in the exercise, determine a format that suits your circumstances, and do the prep needed to make the effort worthwhile. If the approach described in this article feels like a poor fit, review the exercises described in the resources listed below.
Embrace and celebrate progress. In his book, Essentialism, Greg McKeown writes that “Research has shown that of all forms of human motivation the most effective one is progress. Why? Because a small, concrete win creates momentum and affirms our faith in our further success.” After completing the exercise described in this article, your team will have a list of “to-do” items for each of 4 scenarios. Depending on the uncertainties you choose, the extremes of those uncertainties, and the amount of time allotted for brainstorming, your lists could be substantial. Before wrapping up the exercise, take time to prioritize those lists, eliminate steps that feel impractical in a one-year timeframe, and ask participants in the exercise to verbalize a personal commitment to keep the ball rolling. Question prompts to help identify next steps include:
Question prompts to celebrate the progress made include:
In their book See Sooner, Act Faster: How Vigilant Leaders Thrive in an Era of Digital Turbulence, George S. Day and Paul J. H. Schoemaker write:
“The words no board or investor ever wants to hear about an organization’s leaders are ‘they ignored the warning signs’ or ‘they missed the boat.’ Boards don’t expect prescience, but they do rightly rely on the leadership team to see and act on early warning signs of trouble or opportunity.”
Scenario planning is a powerful tool to identify and act on ‘early warning signs’ of trouble. As financial markets and economic conditions continue their volatile trajectories, every nonprofit leadership team should be attuned to the possibilities that could steer a charitable mission away from its intended course. Scenario planning is not a ‘check the box’ activity; the outcomes of the exercise could infuse your mission with resilience to withstand an economic—or other—storm.
Melanie Lockwood Herman is Executive Director of the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. She welcomes your questions about scenario planning and creating practical risk action plans at 703-777-3504 or Melanie@nonprofitrisk.org.
Scenario Planning Resources
There are many approaches to scenario planning. The approach described in this article was inspired by the first article below, from Gartner. Risk leaders interested in designing and facilitating productive scenario planning exercises should take time to review the additional materials listed below. Each resource offers an approach and tips that could help your team prepare for a recession or other disruptive event.
What Functional Leaders Should Know About Scenario Planning – Gartner
Scenario Planning for Nonprofits Amid Covid-19 – The Bridgespan Group (this downloadable tool includes a fillable worksheet)
Making Sense of Uncertainty: Nonprofit Scenario Planning – The Bridgespan Group
How One Organization Used Scenario Planning to Think Through Its Covid-19 Future – Independent Sector
Scenario Planning Playbook-Georgia Center for Nonprofits (includes a worksheet)
Ready and Resilient: Use Scenarios to Plan for What’s Ahead – PWC
Overcoming Obstacles to Effective Scenario Planning – McKinsey & Company
Scenario Planning and Strategic Forecasting – Forbes (outlines the process in 8 steps, includes sample scenario matrix)
Scenario Planning Produces Better Benefits Strategies — SHRM (specific to the context of employee benefits)
NRMC Articles on Resilience and Related Topics
“Facility Agility: Planning for Facility Emergencies,” RISK eNews
“How to Handle the One Thing That’s Certain: Uncertainty,” RISK eNews
“How to Prepare Your Nonprofit for a Recession,” RISK eNews
“Warning Signs: Channeling Cassandra to Fortify Your Mission,” RISK eNews
“To Infinity and Beyond: Unleashing Imagination to Build Your Organization’s Resilience,” RISK eNews
“First let me congratulate you on a conference well done. I had a great time at the Nonprofit Employee Benefits Conference and walked away with some valuable tools and questions that we’ll need to be addressing in both the short and long term. Thanks to you and your staff for all you do to provide us with quality resources in support of our missions.”
“BBYO’s engagement of the Center to conduct a risk assessment was one of the most valuable processes undertaken over the past five years. Numerous programmatic and procedural changes were recommended and have since been implemented. Additionally, dozens (literally) of insurance coverage gaps were identified that would never have been without the work of the Center. This assessment led to a broker bidding process that resulted in BBYO’s selection of a new broker that we have been extremely satisfied with. I unconditionally recommend the Center for their consultative services.
“Melanie Herman has provided expert, insightful, timely and well resourced information to our Executive Team and Board of Directors. Our corporation recently experienced massive growth through merger and the Board has been working to better integrate their expanded set of roles and responsibilities. Melanie presented at our Annual Board of Director’s Retreat and captured the interest of our Board members. As a result of her excellent presentation the Board has engaged in focused review which is having immediate effects on governance.”
“The Nonprofit Risk Management Center has been an outstanding partner for us. They are attentive to our needs, and work hard to successfully meet our requests for information. Being an Affiliate member gave us access to so many time- and money-saving resources that it easily paid for itself! Nonprofit Risk Management Center is truly a valued partner of The Community Foundation of Elkhart County and we are continuously able to optimize staff time with the support given by their team.”
“The board and staff of the Prince George’s Child Resource Center are extremely pleased with the results of the risk assessment conducted by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. A thorough scan revealed that while we are a well run organization, we had risks that we never imagined. We are grateful to know that we have now minimized our organizational risks and we recommend the Center to other nonprofits.”
Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Human Services is committed to protecting those who improve your communities. The Center team has committed to delivering dynamic risk management solutions tailored to nonprofit organizations. These organizations have many and varied risk issues, hence the need for specialized coverage and expert knowledge for their protection. We’ve had Melanie speak on several occasions to employees and our agents. She is always on point and delivers such great value. Thank you for the terrific partnership and allowing our nonprofits to focus on their mission!