Estimated Reading Time: 5 minutes
Executive Director
A short plane ride to Columbus on Saturday offered the ideal opportunity to catch up on overdue reading from some of my favorite weekly e-newsletters. One piece from the team at McKinsey caught my eye by combining two favorite topics in a single headline: “Bias busters: Up-front contingency planning”. The authors of the piece explain that a contingent road map helps leaders create a pathway to update strategy over time by capturing “all the changes that may occur in uncertain markets and when they might occur. Most important, they prescribe specific changes your company must make to its strategy under different scenarios.”
Many nonprofit leaders tell me that contingency planning is a back-burner issue in their organizations. Why? A common reason is that thoughtful contingency plans take a lot of time to draft. Add peer review and executive team approval . . . and a short-term project has become a behemoth burden. But the terrible truth about wise strategic priorities in our sector is that sometimes we choose the wrong strategy. And sometimes the world around us changes in ways that none of us expected, turning our brilliant strategies into costly, losing propositions. If you’ve ever felt stuck with an unworkable strategy—because there simply wasn’t a contingency—a contingency road map might help your team get unstuck. A contingency road map can also help you leverage the upside of risk when things turn out exactly—or surprisingly different—from what you expect.
Inspired by the McKinsey article, I’ve broken down the process of creating a contingency road map into 5 steps.
The first step in creating a contingency map is to select one of the key strategies for your nonprofit. A strategy statement describes a top priority outcome you’re aiming for and a specific timeframe. For example: “Diversify institutional funding in 12 months and increase our total number of $100K donors from 6 to 8.” Or “Increase employee engagement by 10 points in 18 months.” Since most strategic plans include multiple strategies, you’re probably wondering: which strategy should I map? The one we’re least certain about? Or the one we’re most confident about? It’s up to you.
At the first fork on your map, you’ll identify possible outcomes of focus on the strategy articulated under Step 1. For example: “One or more new, institutional funders contribute or pledge a significant amount by January 2020.” While this is the benchmark you may be aiming for, there’s always the possibility that you’ll miss it, surpass it, or wind up in a very different place. Ponder the possibilities of what might happen when your strategy completes its first lap. But in addition to what you hope and expect will happen, add additional possibilities. Questions that can help in identifying those possibilities include:
As you reach this step in developing a contingency map, you may be wondering, “why would I spend time doing this? I’ll just cross the proverbial bridge when I get to it!” Some teams nimbly cross every bridge and capably navigate forks in the road. But in other cases, truly great ideas are abandoned for lack of perspective, or futile efforts doggedly pursued when a team hasn’t considered the possibility of veering off course or facing unfamiliar obstacles.
The second fork in your contingency map offers options based on outcomes after a defined period; include an option you can follow if you’re on track, and at least one option if you’re starting to veer off course.
The third fork in your contingency map offers two or more options when you’re on track at the second benchmark or may have had to change course—due to positive or disappointing results or even circumstances beyond your control. See the pattern?
A contingency map should be the planning equivalent of sighting the horizon while listening to soothing music, secure in knowing that your plan for the “what ifs” along the journey of achieving a strategic priority offers off-ramps, viable alternatives, and inspiration to leverage opportunity when it strikes. When things turn out differently than expected, you already know the levers to pull, the alternatives to pursue, and the projects or efforts that need to be euthanized.
With respect to the importance of following a contingency map, McKinsey colleagues Kohler, Courtney and Lavallo remind their readers that “Decision makers commit up front to follow the road map and the actions required each step of the way—including, in some cases, killing a project entirely. The road map then becomes both a catalyst for change and a means to insulate decision makers from biases.”
Perhaps the best-known quote about forks is the one attributed to Yogi Berra: “When you come to a fork in the road, take it.” A Contingency Map is a simple tool for identifying possible paths that your strategies will take and possible actions when you reach the inevitable forks in the road. None of us have the ability to draw a map that will reflect exactly how things will turn out and the full range of options we’ll face when we reach the way stations on our mission journeys. Taking time to consider check-in points, reflection opportunities and even the possibility of abandoning course—is worth the time required. Doing so should inspire confidence in your organization’s nimbleness and agility. That confidence should translate into fuel to take the bold risks your mission requires.
Melanie Lockwood Herman is Executive Director of the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. She welcomes your questions and comments about contingency maps and other risk tools, or questions about the mission, programs, and services of NRMC. Contact Melanie at 703.777.3504 or Melanie@nonprofitrisk.org.
“First let me congratulate you on a conference well done. I had a great time at the Nonprofit Employee Benefits Conference and walked away with some valuable tools and questions that we’ll need to be addressing in both the short and long term. Thanks to you and your staff for all you do to provide us with quality resources in support of our missions.”
“BBYO’s engagement of the Center to conduct a risk assessment was one of the most valuable processes undertaken over the past five years. Numerous programmatic and procedural changes were recommended and have since been implemented. Additionally, dozens (literally) of insurance coverage gaps were identified that would never have been without the work of the Center. This assessment led to a broker bidding process that resulted in BBYO’s selection of a new broker that we have been extremely satisfied with. I unconditionally recommend the Center for their consultative services.
“Melanie Herman has provided expert, insightful, timely and well resourced information to our Executive Team and Board of Directors. Our corporation recently experienced massive growth through merger and the Board has been working to better integrate their expanded set of roles and responsibilities. Melanie presented at our Annual Board of Director’s Retreat and captured the interest of our Board members. As a result of her excellent presentation the Board has engaged in focused review which is having immediate effects on governance.”
“The Nonprofit Risk Management Center has been an outstanding partner for us. They are attentive to our needs, and work hard to successfully meet our requests for information. Being an Affiliate member gave us access to so many time- and money-saving resources that it easily paid for itself! Nonprofit Risk Management Center is truly a valued partner of The Community Foundation of Elkhart County and we are continuously able to optimize staff time with the support given by their team.”
“The board and staff of the Prince George’s Child Resource Center are extremely pleased with the results of the risk assessment conducted by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. A thorough scan revealed that while we are a well run organization, we had risks that we never imagined. We are grateful to know that we have now minimized our organizational risks and we recommend the Center to other nonprofits.”
Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Human Services is committed to protecting those who improve your communities. The Center team has committed to delivering dynamic risk management solutions tailored to nonprofit organizations. These organizations have many and varied risk issues, hence the need for specialized coverage and expert knowledge for their protection. We’ve had Melanie speak on several occasions to employees and our agents. She is always on point and delivers such great value. Thank you for the terrific partnership and allowing our nonprofits to focus on their mission!