Fact Sheet – Active Shooters
Estimated Reading Time: 5 minutes
By the NRMC Team
Resource Type: Articles
Topic: Crisis Management, Crisis Communications, Facility, Program and Transportation Safety
Key Considerations and Approaches
More than 160 active shootings were documented in the U.S. from 2000 to 2013 and the number of events escalates each year. The agreed-upon definition of an active shooter by U.S. government agenciesincluding the White House, U.S. Department of Justice/FBI, U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency is “an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.” Implicit in this definition is that the subject’s criminal actions involve the use of firearms.
Active shooter incidents occur in areas where the general population is not anticipating danger: movie theaters, schools, hospitals, shopping malls, and businesses. These events are very hard to anticipate, and can last minutes or be protracted over many hours.
Preparing for an Active Shooter Situation
As with any aspect of a business continuity or emergency plan, nonprofit leadership teams should consider a number of key issues when formulating an active shooter response. Consistent with key considerations identified by the Healthcare and Public Health Sector Coordinating Council, the Center recommends that teams consider:
- Establishing a preferred method for reporting active shooter incidents
- Communicating emergency escape procedures (e.g., floor plans, safe areas, route assignments) to key stakeholders
- Instituting lockdown procedures for individual units, service site and facilities
- Integrating shooter response plans with the organization’s or facility’s Emergency Operations Plan, crisis plan and/or business continuity plan
- Documenting key information concerning local area emergency response agencies and hospitals (e.g., name, telephone number, and distance from your location)
Preparation is not complete until the plan is documented and shared with first responders (e.g., local police, Sheriffs, SWAT, FBI) in the community in which the nonprofit is based. Emergency responders will also need a diagram of the building identifying all possible entry points, the number of staff and clients within the building, access controls and locks. Communicating these security measures with first responders is key to enabling the first responders to assist the nonprofit in a crisis involving an active shooter.
Response Plan
There is no single best method to react to an active shooter. Prior planning and careful practice will empower you and your staff to make the best decisions in a heightened situation, with the goal of preserving lives.
Your primary goal in an active shooter scenario is to reduce or limit the shooter’s access to potential victims and thereby mitigate the loss of lives. The Run-Hide-Fight active shooter video and public service announcement created by the City of Houston, Texas and the Department of Homeland Security is the most referenced YouTube video on the subject with over three million YouTube views. The suggested approach is clear, uses language common in other response situations, and was designed to give three distinct steps to take in a frightening event when thoughts are not clear, similar to “Stop-Drop-Roll” for during a fire. The critics to the popular Run- Hide-Fight approach suggest that each step has its flaws. Running could drive you straight into further danger, hiding could make you a sitting target, and fighting could exceed your self-defense skills. The overarching reminder is that each action of Run-Hide-Fight should be selected only when it is deemed safe for your specific situation.
RUN – IMMEDIATELY EVACUATE THE AREA.
This step is consistent with a human being’s natural response in a dangerous situationto remove yourself from harm. Unfortunately, this is not always a viable option as escaping could draw more attention and put you in closer proximity to the shooter. There is compelling evidence that those closest to the active shooter are most likely to suffer serious and fatal injuries. With that in mind, if a safe path is available, take it.
HIDE – SEEK COVER AND DENY SHOOTER ACCESS.
If you aren’t able to safely leave the area of the active shooter, your next option should be to avoid detection, and wait for emergency response to arrive. Hiding can be dangerous because it can leave you trapped if the intruder detects your location. This step is advised when you are unable to exit safely and you are not sure of the intruder’s location. Find a place to take cover, barricade the door and silence your cellphone. If possible, call 911 or emergency from a landline or your cellphone.
FIGHT – ATTACK OR INCAPACITATE THE ASSAILANT.
This method should be used when it is not possible or practical to run or hide. Fight the attacker aggressively with all resources and weapons available, including ordinary items such as a pen, fire extinguisher or even hot coffee.
Snapshot
The following characteristics of the 160 active shooter incidents identified between 2000 and 2013 are rooted:
- An average of 11.4 incidents occurred annually.
- An average of 6.4 incidents occurred in the first? years studied, and an average of 16.4 occurred in the last 7 years.
- 70.0% of the incidents occurredin either a commerce/business or educational environment.10
- Shootings occurred in 40 of 50 states and the District of Columbia.
- 60.0% of the incidents ended before police arrived.
* A handful of those identified as “wounded” were not injured by gun fire but rather suffered injuries incidental to the event, such as being hit by flying objects/shattered glass or falling while running. This does not account for a all those wounded in this fashion or any mental or emotional trauma that resulted in potential medical treatment.
10 All percentages are rounded to the nearest tenth.
Resources
Discussion of Run, Hide, Fight Response – “Incorporating Active Shooter Incident Planning into Health Care Facility Emergency Operations Plans”
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Federal Emergency Management Agency
www.phe.gov/preparedness/planning/Documents/active-shooter-planning-eop2014.pdf
Operations plans – “Guide for Developing High-Quality Emergency Operations Plans for Houses of Worship”
FEMA
- Department of Education
- Department of Justice
- Department of Justice _ Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Department of Health & Human Services
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/developing_eops_for_houses_of_worship_final.pdf
First Responders jurisdiction – Snapshot of active shooter incidents 2000 to 2013
- Department of Justice _ Federal Bureau of Investigation
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/fbi-releases-study-on-active-shooter-incidents
What to do in a crisis situation – “Active Shooter Preparedness”
- Homeland Security – www.dhs.gov/active-shooter-preparedness
Lessons learned in crisis situations – “Guide for Developing High-Quality Emergency Operations Plans for Institutions of Higher Education”
The information contained in this Fact Sheet is intended to help nonprofit organizations begin formulating their procedures in the event of an active shooter. To learn more about how the Nonprofit Risk Management Center can help your nonprofit prepare for these risks and others, contact Kay Nakamura, Director of Client Solutions, Kay@nonprofitrisk.org or 703.777.3504.
“First let me congratulate you on a conference well done. I had a great time at the Nonprofit Employee Benefits Conference and walked away with some valuable tools and questions that we’ll need to be addressing in both the short and long term. Thanks to you and your staff for all you do to provide us with quality resources in support of our missions.”
— Scott Brown, Mohonk Preserve
“BBYO’s engagement of the Center to conduct a risk assessment was one of the most valuable processes undertaken over the past five years. Numerous programmatic and procedural changes were recommended and have since been implemented. Additionally, dozens (literally) of insurance coverage gaps were identified that would never have been without the work of the Center. This assessment led to a broker bidding process that resulted in BBYO’s selection of a new broker that we have been extremely satisfied with. I unconditionally recommend the Center for their consultative services.
— Sidney Abrams, BBYO
“Melanie Herman has provided expert, insightful, timely and well resourced information to our Executive Team and Board of Directors. Our corporation recently experienced massive growth through merger and the Board has been working to better integrate their expanded set of roles and responsibilities. Melanie presented at our Annual Board of Director’s Retreat and captured the interest of our Board members. As a result of her excellent presentation the Board has engaged in focused review which is having immediate effects on governance.”
— Pamela Mattel, Basics Promesa Systems Inc
“The Nonprofit Risk Management Center has been an outstanding partner for us. They are attentive to our needs, and work hard to successfully meet our requests for information. Being an Affiliate member gave us access to so many time- and money-saving resources that it easily paid for itself! Nonprofit Risk Management Center is truly a valued partner of The Community Foundation of Elkhart County and we are continuously able to optimize staff time with the support given by their team.”
— Jodi Spataro, Community Foundation of Elkhart County
“The board and staff of the Prince George’s Child Resource Center are extremely pleased with the results of the risk assessment conducted by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. A thorough scan revealed that while we are a well run organization, we had risks that we never imagined. We are grateful to know that we have now minimized our organizational risks and we recommend the Center to other nonprofits.”
— Marti Worshtil, Prince George’s Child Resource Center
Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Human Services is committed to protecting those who improve your communities. The Center team has committed to delivering dynamic risk management solutions tailored to nonprofit organizations. These organizations have many and varied risk issues, hence the need for specialized coverage and expert knowledge for their protection. We’ve had Melanie speak on several occasions to employees and our agents. She is always on point and delivers such great value. Thank you for the terrific partnership and allowing our nonprofits to focus on their mission!