Estimated Reading Time: 7 minutes
By the NRMC Team
Resource Type: Articles
Topic: Crisis Management, Crisis Communications, Facility, Program and Transportation Safety
Fires, explosions, chemical releases, violence or biological releases pose a threat to everyone in your organization’s facilities. One way to ensure the safety of all affected populations and reduce the risk to your organization is to have an evacuation plan. The beauty of this strategy is that even the smallest organization operating with meager resources can afford to develop and implement an evacuation plan. The downside is you can’t afford not to implement it. One of the most devastating losses to an organization is the loss of human life. Not only is it emotionally depleting, it can involve adverse publicity, large settlements, loss of organizational leadership, and the inability to deliver programs or services. Thus, your emergency evacuation plan can make life-or-death differences for your staff, volunteers, visitors, vendors and program participants. It could also mean life or death for your mission.
The goal of all evacuation plans is to provide safe passage from the building for all people. Try to establish a single route — no matter what the threat — to make it easy for people to remember and follow. As you plot the evacuation route, you’ll want to take into account and avoid passing by or through areas where additional risks lurk: janitorial/housekeeping supply closets, boiler and machinery rooms, chemical storage areas, fuel supplies, chemistry or art labs, and large expanses of glass (windows and skylights). Since elevators and escalators (which can fail and cause additional injuries) are to be avoided, the route will have to use stairways, fire escapes and/or windows, possibly with escape ladders.
The evacuation isn’t complete until everyone is accounted for, thus you’ll need to designate a rendezvous point far enough from your facility to keep people out of harm’s way. Perhaps pick a place across the street and down the block, rather than choosing the driveway in front of the building where emergency vehicles or debris and smoke could threaten folks once they’re out of the building. Consider contacting your local fire department for advice on a suitable spot to convene employees following an evacuation. In a small organization, it will be easier to verify that everyone’s assembled or who is missing. In a large operation, or an organization with many programs and/or sites, it will be more efficient to divide and conquer. Program or department heads can be assigned responsibility for verifying the whereabouts of the people in their charge. In addition to employees, volunteers and program participants, these leaders most likely will be aware of visitors, vendors, board members, reporters and others interacting with their department or program who were in the building at the time the emergency evacuation was declared. Once you’ve established if anyone’s missing, inform emergency crews about the results of your headcount and allow them to take over the search from the person’s last known location within the facility. In general, no one should return to the building until the emergency professionals (fire, police, EMT, Hazmat team) have given permission indicating that the threat has passed and it’s safe to return to the building.
In general the responsibilities for developing the plan and carrying it out fall as follows:
The following sample is written as a response to a fire. Some tweaking will be required to accommodate special considerations for physically or mentally impaired individuals, for an explosion or bomb threat, a chemical release or spill, a biohazard exposure, or an incident of violence on your premises. An evacuation plan for each special accommodation could be developed and filed in your organization’s Crisis Management Manual.
National Fire Protection 101 Life Safety Code, The Americans with Disabilities Act, and American National Standard A227.1 include standards that relate to permanently or temporarily impaired people. In a nutshell, these include knowing where these people are located throughout the day or evening. Physically impaired individuals should go to a predetermined “safe area” — an enclosed stairwell or a room just off the hallway or corridor, and wait for assistance. In the room, they should close the door; and drape a piece of clothing across or out the window to signal they are waiting for help.
Chemical agents are poisonous gases, liquids or solids that cause serious injuries or death. Treatment varies depending on the type of agent, amount of agent used and the length of exposure. Consult your local fire department for advice on responding to these hazards.
Biological agents are organisms or toxins that produce illness in people. Unless an informant or terrorist alerts authorities to an attack, it’s almost impossible to know the attack has occurred. Victims require immediate attention of professional medical personnel.
When the building is threatened with impending attack, there may be enough time to evacuate the building safely. If not, or if the attack is the first notification of an emergency, people may have to wait until they identify where the gunman is before they evacuate. Another solution is the lockdown, which has been used in schools since the 1999 Columbine shootings. Teachers keep students secured in classrooms with shades drawn. Work with your local police and fire departments to determine the best way to respond to an act of violence and write your instructions accordingly.
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, if items are falling, get under a sturdy table or desk. If there’s a fire:
Read our book on crisis management: Vital Signs: Anticipating, Preventing and Surviving Crisis in a Nonprofit.
Explore the Workplace Safety Toolkit.
“First let me congratulate you on a conference well done. I had a great time at the Nonprofit Employee Benefits Conference and walked away with some valuable tools and questions that we’ll need to be addressing in both the short and long term. Thanks to you and your staff for all you do to provide us with quality resources in support of our missions.”
“BBYO’s engagement of the Center to conduct a risk assessment was one of the most valuable processes undertaken over the past five years. Numerous programmatic and procedural changes were recommended and have since been implemented. Additionally, dozens (literally) of insurance coverage gaps were identified that would never have been without the work of the Center. This assessment led to a broker bidding process that resulted in BBYO’s selection of a new broker that we have been extremely satisfied with. I unconditionally recommend the Center for their consultative services.
“Melanie Herman has provided expert, insightful, timely and well resourced information to our Executive Team and Board of Directors. Our corporation recently experienced massive growth through merger and the Board has been working to better integrate their expanded set of roles and responsibilities. Melanie presented at our Annual Board of Director’s Retreat and captured the interest of our Board members. As a result of her excellent presentation the Board has engaged in focused review which is having immediate effects on governance.”
“The Nonprofit Risk Management Center has been an outstanding partner for us. They are attentive to our needs, and work hard to successfully meet our requests for information. Being an Affiliate member gave us access to so many time- and money-saving resources that it easily paid for itself! Nonprofit Risk Management Center is truly a valued partner of The Community Foundation of Elkhart County and we are continuously able to optimize staff time with the support given by their team.”
“The board and staff of the Prince George’s Child Resource Center are extremely pleased with the results of the risk assessment conducted by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. A thorough scan revealed that while we are a well run organization, we had risks that we never imagined. We are grateful to know that we have now minimized our organizational risks and we recommend the Center to other nonprofits.”
Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Human Services is committed to protecting those who improve your communities. The Center team has committed to delivering dynamic risk management solutions tailored to nonprofit organizations. These organizations have many and varied risk issues, hence the need for specialized coverage and expert knowledge for their protection. We’ve had Melanie speak on several occasions to employees and our agents. She is always on point and delivers such great value. Thank you for the terrific partnership and allowing our nonprofits to focus on their mission!