Estimated Reading Time: 5 minutes
By Melanie Lockwood Herman
This week I’ve been reading Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less by Greg McKeown. The book’s themes touch on a prickly subject for me: saying “no.” A very wise friend once told me that we often say yes out of fear that if we say no, we won’t get asked again. Rarely is that the case.
I attended a meeting this week with a large team that was trying to assess the risk that a slate of new initiatives might overwhelm key functions and departments. Often, we are drawn to ‘doing more’ to usher forward the ‘good.’ However, when the sheer volume of initiatives begin to outweigh the benefits they produce, many nonprofit teams are left feeling a sense of dread. I sense that many risk champions and professionals feel overwhelmed by a weighty to-do list, multiple—sometimes competing—priorities, and a sense of trying to go in many directions.
This observation made one of my first “ah-ha” moments from McKeown’s book especially profound. The author explained the origin of the word priority. He writes:
“The word priority came into the English language in the 1400s. It was singular. It meant the very first or prior thing. It stayed singular for the next five hundred years. Only in the 1900s did we pluralize the term and start talking about priorities. Illogically, we reasoned that by changing the word we could bend reality. Somehow we would now be able to have multiple “first” things.”
Many nonprofit teams adopt multiple “strategic priorities” (note the plurality!). Risk teams often begin their work by compiling a run-on list of risks in a format called the Risk Register. Imagine the potential for focus and impact if we were to adopt a single, true priority? What IS the most important priority of your risk management department, function, or team? To borrow from Gary Keller, author of The ONE Thing, what is the one thing your risk team could do that would make everything else easier or unnecessary? What is the essential goal you’re trying to achieve? If your risk function were on fire, what’s the one thing you would clutch as you’re running away from the flames?
McKeown reminds us that when there are too many options, decision fatigue quickly sets in. The creators of a popular time and productivity tracking tool, RescueTime, define decision fatigue as simply “the deterioration of our ability to make good decisions after a long session of decision making.”
When nonprofit leaders stretch staff too thinly with many priorities to ‘do more’ for the mission, teams experience exhaustion trying to juggle all the decisions necessary to keep every ball successfully in the air. When this happens, productivity plummets and progress, programs, and the important work of the nonprofit suffer.
How do teams combat decision fatigue?
In Essentialism, McKeown writes, “The way of the Essentialist isn’t about setting New Year’s resolutions to say ‘no’ more, or about pruning your in-box, or about mastering some new strategy in time management. It is about constantly pausing to ask, ‘Am I investing in the right activities?’” If you’ve ever felt—even for a moment—that your risk function is like a hamster on a wheel, know that it’s possible to get off the wheel and put it away forever.
By distinguishing the essential work from the noise, nonprofit leaders can make more informed decisions about when to say no and where to focus resources for the most impact. The critical element is the pause. However brief, the pause to consider if activities, programs, and opportunities are serving the mission presents a quiet space to focus on what is truly essential.
The following are examples of singular risk priorities that could galvanize a team and bring focus to everything else you’re trying to accomplish in your risk function. Choose one—or better yet—craft your own to define your team’s singular risk priority for this year.
Once you identify your singular priority, continue working with your risk team to define the WHAT (steps, strategies, and activities), the WHO (make sure you’re benefitting from diverse points of view instead of tackling challenges using a singular, narrow lens), and the WHEN (choose ambitious but reasonable deadlines for milestones to measure if you’re on track). By focusing on one significant, essential thing your nonprofit team can cut through the clutter and capably move on the path to achieving something meaningful that truly matters to your mission.
For additional insights on prioritizing, paring back, and defining key objectives in your risk function, see these NRMC articles:
Melanie Lockwood Herman is Executive Director of the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. Contact Melanie with questions about risk, or to share how you’re paring down a long to-do list to discover your singular risk priority. She welcomes your feedback about essentialism, leadership, and the wide world of risk at 703.777.3504 or Melanie@nonprofitrisk.org.
“First let me congratulate you on a conference well done. I had a great time at the Nonprofit Employee Benefits Conference and walked away with some valuable tools and questions that we’ll need to be addressing in both the short and long term. Thanks to you and your staff for all you do to provide us with quality resources in support of our missions.”
“BBYO’s engagement of the Center to conduct a risk assessment was one of the most valuable processes undertaken over the past five years. Numerous programmatic and procedural changes were recommended and have since been implemented. Additionally, dozens (literally) of insurance coverage gaps were identified that would never have been without the work of the Center. This assessment led to a broker bidding process that resulted in BBYO’s selection of a new broker that we have been extremely satisfied with. I unconditionally recommend the Center for their consultative services.
“Melanie Herman has provided expert, insightful, timely and well resourced information to our Executive Team and Board of Directors. Our corporation recently experienced massive growth through merger and the Board has been working to better integrate their expanded set of roles and responsibilities. Melanie presented at our Annual Board of Director’s Retreat and captured the interest of our Board members. As a result of her excellent presentation the Board has engaged in focused review which is having immediate effects on governance.”
“The Nonprofit Risk Management Center has been an outstanding partner for us. They are attentive to our needs, and work hard to successfully meet our requests for information. Being an Affiliate member gave us access to so many time- and money-saving resources that it easily paid for itself! Nonprofit Risk Management Center is truly a valued partner of The Community Foundation of Elkhart County and we are continuously able to optimize staff time with the support given by their team.”
“The board and staff of the Prince George’s Child Resource Center are extremely pleased with the results of the risk assessment conducted by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. A thorough scan revealed that while we are a well run organization, we had risks that we never imagined. We are grateful to know that we have now minimized our organizational risks and we recommend the Center to other nonprofits.”
Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Human Services is committed to protecting those who improve your communities. The Center team has committed to delivering dynamic risk management solutions tailored to nonprofit organizations. These organizations have many and varied risk issues, hence the need for specialized coverage and expert knowledge for their protection. We’ve had Melanie speak on several occasions to employees and our agents. She is always on point and delivers such great value. Thank you for the terrific partnership and allowing our nonprofits to focus on their mission!