Accountability Measures: A Closer Look at Service Statistics
Estimated Reading Time: 3 minutes
By John C. Patterson, Senior Program Director
Resource Type: Articles
Topic: Facility, Program and Transportation Safety, Fraud and Financial Oversight
In this age of increased accountability, nonprofits are subjected to increased scrutiny in financial management, outcome measurement, and new service statistics.
Service Statistics
Service statistics may include an organization’s membership, numbers of clients served, and hours of service delivered. Organizations have a great deal of discretion in defining their specific units of service delivery.
When properly used, service statistics are important indices of how well organizations are accomplishing their missions or how well they are meeting a community need.
Program funding is often contingent on demonstrating that an organization is able to help address an identified problem. In addition, nonprofit employees may be evaluated on the achievement of service delivery goals—the more difficult the goals are, the better the opportunities for advancement.
Service statistics represent resources that deserve as much attention as organizational finances. The two resources are directly related because many funders base their allocations upon membership and other service statistics as reported by the organization. Advertisers in a nonprofit’s publication may also base their decision to advertise on the promised circulation of the publication. Most often, these figures are accepted at face value.
Even within membership organizations, boards of directors seldom delve into membership numbers or question the numbers reported by staff. With the twin pressures of financial support and professional advancement, some nonprofit professionals have resorted to falsification of service statistics. Individuals who inflate service statistics within nonprofit organizations risk criminal prosecution based on possible violations of a number of federal and state statutes. Alleged falsification of membership statistics could be construed as mail fraud when the report is delivered via the U.S. Postal Service.
Virtually all nonprofit organizations are susceptible to inflated service statistics. Over time, statistical inflation becomes as shaky as the proverbial house of cards and threatens not only the credibility of the organization, but its viability.
Simple Steps to Take
Avoiding the pitfall of inflated service statistics requires some simple steps:
- Clearly define terms used in gathering statistics for the organization: for instance, who is a member, who is a service recipient, and what is a provided service.
- Develop forthright audit techniques that mirror the terms defined; membership or client groups, like money, fluctuate during the course of the year and some reporting measures are misleading.
- Appoint a committee to periodically examine the documentation of stated membership and other service statistics.
- Pay special attention to subsidized memberships; consider additional scrutiny such as requiring member signatures.
- Conduct a special membership or client group review each time the chief executive officer of the organization changes. This action would serve to establish the baseline upon which future growth would be measured.
Every organization tries to maximize the appearance of how truly the community is dependent on them for their services. If the organization defines the terms it’s using, there is no question of falsification, and it’s easier for the public to reconcile perceptions with reality. Organizations should treat statistics they generate with the same degree of care that they do their money.
Accountability Resources
- “Managing Risk in Nonprofit Organizations: A Comprehensive Guide,” book
- “Pillars of Accountability: A Risk Management Guide for Nonprofit Boards,” book/downloadable book
- “Pillars of Accountability in the Nonprofit World,” online assessment tool
“First let me congratulate you on a conference well done. I had a great time at the Nonprofit Employee Benefits Conference and walked away with some valuable tools and questions that we’ll need to be addressing in both the short and long term. Thanks to you and your staff for all you do to provide us with quality resources in support of our missions.”
— Scott Brown, Mohonk Preserve
“BBYO’s engagement of the Center to conduct a risk assessment was one of the most valuable processes undertaken over the past five years. Numerous programmatic and procedural changes were recommended and have since been implemented. Additionally, dozens (literally) of insurance coverage gaps were identified that would never have been without the work of the Center. This assessment led to a broker bidding process that resulted in BBYO’s selection of a new broker that we have been extremely satisfied with. I unconditionally recommend the Center for their consultative services.
— Sidney Abrams, BBYO
“Melanie Herman has provided expert, insightful, timely and well resourced information to our Executive Team and Board of Directors. Our corporation recently experienced massive growth through merger and the Board has been working to better integrate their expanded set of roles and responsibilities. Melanie presented at our Annual Board of Director’s Retreat and captured the interest of our Board members. As a result of her excellent presentation the Board has engaged in focused review which is having immediate effects on governance.”
— Pamela Mattel, Basics Promesa Systems Inc
“The Nonprofit Risk Management Center has been an outstanding partner for us. They are attentive to our needs, and work hard to successfully meet our requests for information. Being an Affiliate member gave us access to so many time- and money-saving resources that it easily paid for itself! Nonprofit Risk Management Center is truly a valued partner of The Community Foundation of Elkhart County and we are continuously able to optimize staff time with the support given by their team.”
— Jodi Spataro, Community Foundation of Elkhart County
“The board and staff of the Prince George’s Child Resource Center are extremely pleased with the results of the risk assessment conducted by the Nonprofit Risk Management Center. A thorough scan revealed that while we are a well run organization, we had risks that we never imagined. We are grateful to know that we have now minimized our organizational risks and we recommend the Center to other nonprofits.”
— Marti Worshtil, Prince George’s Child Resource Center
Great American Insurance Group’s Specialty Human Services is committed to protecting those who improve your communities. The Center team has committed to delivering dynamic risk management solutions tailored to nonprofit organizations. These organizations have many and varied risk issues, hence the need for specialized coverage and expert knowledge for their protection. We’ve had Melanie speak on several occasions to employees and our agents. She is always on point and delivers such great value. Thank you for the terrific partnership and allowing our nonprofits to focus on their mission!